FonterraFarmer
Member
- Location
- Waikato, New Zealand
FFS, we have no nuclear power stations down here, hence your quote is irrelivant.Kiwi Pete, the cow/possum link proves nothing. You are coming to infectious conclusions. I am saying that TB is homeostasis and so lesions indicate that the immune system has walled off the poison. Lesions do not tell me that the cow was feeling sick. It may have been a healthy cow because this is the nature of homeostasis. We all know that lesions are not something that we want to find, but lesions offer no proof of an 'infectious' disease. A lesion is more likely poison related.
The testing or the interpretation of a test result is by default translated into infectious language as this is dictated by industry and government. This is done for a political reason. Look back at 1986, the pollution caused by Chernobyl, which would add a poison into the environment and so 'reactor cows' peaked. The recipe was nuclear pollution (poison), followed by immune response, metamorphosis, walling off the poison into lesions, homeostasis. When the immune system has reached its limit, the animal gets sick or dies. This is then blamed on an 'infectious' disease aimed to defend the poison industry. The cows getting sick 'seem' to offer evidence of an infectious disease, but in fact, each individual cow was being poisoned through nuclear pollution. It was an individual poison-related disease, not an infectious disease. Any academic who sides with this will be punished, so keeping mum is the only option. Therefore, we have conflicts of interest. One hundred years of misinformation in which we are all raised in this environment. We are all heavily conditioned to think like this. This is the nature of propaganda, aimed to make you think that black is white, aimed to make you think that a healthy cow is a 'sick cow'. John Wantling, Rochdale