our one hasSome of the 565 had the hydraulic ipto iirc.
our one hasSome of the 565 had the hydraulic ipto iirc.
And ourssame spec as ours....
our one has been very good, had it 30 years with no big problemsHow realible has your 565 been .
very good.How realible has your 565 been .
no B pillar the future 30 odd years agoI could almost sing that reply ...........
Massey _3115
You will definitely have more choice with 6150 than 3075. Good 3000 series are very rare now.
We have owned a 3085 Dynashift, a 6150 Dynashift and a 6265 Dynashift, the 6265 was the worst tractor we have ever owned, so I may be a wee bit biased but I would be looking for a 61 rather than 62.
Our 390 had the 12x12 box with 40k and was a brilliant tractor, but again like the 3000 series finding a good genuine one will come with a silly price tag!
Aye, nowt wrong with a good old 6200 Massey!!I'm looking to upgrade my mf565 - Which of the two tractors would be the better buy too look out for? Either a 6150 or a 3075? I've seen a few tidy 6150s about recently, but not many 3075's though. I assume they have Pretty much the same engine and gear box apart from dynashift / speed shift. I also Assume the front axles pivot pin is as bad promote to wear as the 3075, and Also assume the brakes are the similar for wear too and the potential to cause hydraulic pump issues. Is there any other problems a 6150 would have that the 3075 would have or vice versa?
Advice greatly recieved !
But for a 'C' pillar four times the sizeno B pillar the future 30 odd years ago
Easy enough to fix thatour t reg 6265 was a gutless heap of........ Not a patch on the 3075 it replaced
Our 6265 was a gutless bugger too!!!!!! In about 4000 hours the engine was rebuilt twice, it had new turbos, the list is end less, which was shame because it was a nice tractor to drive, if you kept the revs up!!! It had to go in the end. We replaced it with a 6480, a different beast altogether.our t reg 6265 was a gutless heap of........ Not a patch on the 3075 it replaced
compared to the 6290s that we had it was rubbish. We still have a 399 & a 390T, they do bugger all nowadays but get dragged out every now n then. I know they don't have the refinements of the modern tractors but I still enjoy spending the odd day on them!!Our 6265 was a gutless bugger too!!!!!! In about 4000 hours the engine was rebuilt twice, it had new turbos, the list is end less, which was shame because it was a nice tractor to drive, if you kept the revs up!!! It had to go in the end. We replaced it with a 6480, a different beast altogether.
Yet my student farm ran them and they were never any real bother except for the odd head gasket on the 595. The 590s were opico turboed as well. pulled well for that era. I would sooner sit on a tidy 500 than the (is he listening?) 265.590 would have the back end rolled out from under the cab every 1000 hours, sometimes twice the same month. If it wasn't lift arms refusing to lift it was the steel pipes inside cracking, starving the hydraulic PTO from oil. Everything had to be replaced, in the hope we would get a bit longer next time ...........
The 565 had mechanical PTO (on the clutch pedal) so you had half a chance .........