More BBC bull

Bald Rick

Moderator
Livestock Farmer
Location
Anglesey
This report https://es.catapult.org.uk/news/net-zero-by-2050-is-possible/

was on Radio 2 news at both 8am & 8.30am but dropped by 9am onwards.

When the report was mentioned, it was stated that in order for UK to be "carbon neutral by 2050" we needed to stop flying and cut out red meat & dairy consumption (although the report does not say this).
Now after my waters had stopped boiling, I realised that it was headlines on the radio at those times because whomever puts the bulletins together knows that kids are being taken to school then and it's likely that the parent may have R2 on.

To put such a bias slant on is wrong but reflects the times we live in
 

jondear

Member
Location
Devon
Yep on radio1 all morning .Noticed the same stopped at nine . Maximum impact to drip feed the anti meat agenda!
Obviously a vegan biased editor .On the article online there is a response from national beef association but nothing in a short news clip !
 

Bury the Trash

Member
Mixed Farmer
This report https://es.catapult.org.uk/news/net-zero-by-2050-is-possible/

was on Radio 2 news at both 8am & 8.30am but dropped by 9am onwards.

When the report was mentioned, it was stated that in order for UK to be "carbon neutral by 2050" we needed to stop flying and cut out red meat & dairy consumption (although the report does not say this).
Now after my waters had stopped boiling, I realised that it was headlines on the radio at those times because whomever puts the bulletins together knows that kids are being taken to school then and it's likely that the parent may have R2 on.

To put such a bias slant on is wrong but reflects the times we live in
They need to be reminded that flying , not red meat and dairy consumption , ...... has spread this killer virus around the world.
 

delilah

Member
It was on R4 early doors. I think the idea that it was put out to catch the school run may be crediting editors with too much intellect.
Maybe it was dropped from 9am because by then someone from our national representative bodies got on to them and pointed out that the coverage was lying regarding what is in that report ?
(I know, sorry, been a long day).
 

Bald Rick

Moderator
Livestock Farmer
Location
Anglesey
It was on R4 early doors. I think the idea that it was put out to catch the school run may be crediting editors with too much intellect.
Maybe it was dropped from 9am because by then someone from our national representative bodies got on to them and pointed out that the coverage was lying regarding what is in that report ?
(I know, sorry, been a long day).

It was a Government sponsored report supposedly from independent sources but it appears that the main authors are heavily linked to renewable energy especially wind turbines,

To my mind, all these reports are relatively pointless because they are adamant that they can fundamentally change centuries of human behaviour within a few decades.
The report also states that the U.K. would need to plant trees an area twice the size of Birmingham every year between now and 2050. That plainly won’t happen and that is perhaps the most achievable of all their recommendations
 

delilah

Member
The report also states that the U.K. would need to plant an area twice the size of Birmingham every year between now and 2050. That plainly won’t happen and that is perhaps the most achievable of all their recommendations

Of trees ? Then that in itself shows what a p!ss poor piece of work it is; it has been clearly established on here that grassland is better than trees when it comes to long term reliable carbon capture and storage.
 

GeorgeK

Member
Location
Leicestershire
The article was edited at some point. Originally it had a heading titled 'British Beef' and a whole section devoted to criticising it. This was later removed, I assume because the bias against beef was excessive even for the Beeb. The space given to debating flying was tiny in comparison, it's slightly more even now
 

Happy

Member
Location
Scotland
The article was edited at some point. Originally it had a heading titled 'British Beef' and a whole section devoted to criticising it. This was later removed, I assume because the bias against beef was excessive even for the Beeb. The space given to debating flying was tiny in comparison, it's slightly more even now

Should come as no surprise.
This government is even more anti farming than the BBC.
Have said on here on a few occasions now that the bbc are not coming up with all this anti farming stuff themselves.
It’s clearly all part of a well coordinated govt plan of telling the UK public something often enough that they’ll accept it unquestionably as fact.
 
Should come as no surprise.
This government is even more anti farming than the BBC.
Have said on here on a few occasions now that the bbc are not coming up with all this anti farming stuff themselves.
It’s clearly all part of a well coordinated govt plan of telling the UK public something often enough that they’ll accept it unquestionably as fact.
I dont believe this government is anti-farming.
They just don't care about farming. We are too small to matter.
 

Happy

Member
Location
Scotland
I dont believe this government is anti-farming.
They just don't care about farming. We are too small to matter.

If not the Governent Defra certainly is.
You only have to look at all the senior advisor and board menber appointments made in the last couple of years and policy announcements that have followed.

George Eustice probably only eventually got the job as they reckon the medicine that’s coming to us will be more readily accepted from him than a chum of the anti-farming Mr‘s Juniper, Goldsmith‘s and others who create all the current public money for public good without food production policy.
 
If not the Governent Defra certainly is.
You only have to look at all the senior advisor and board menber appointments made in the last couple of years and policy announcements that have followed.

George Eustice probably only eventually got the job as they reckon the medicine that’s coming to us will be more readily accepted from him than a chum of the anti-farming Mr‘s Juniper, Goldsmith‘s and others who create all the current public money for public good without food production policy.


Yep ..

George Useless ..
 
And to think we are forced by law to pay for this.
Do people who use receational drugs have any guilt about braking the "law"?
Just tell anyone who tells you that your obligated to paying a tv licensing fee that hell will fecking freeze over before you pay it, reallly what are they going to do about it, eh? ??
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 103 40.6%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 93 36.6%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 39 15.4%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 2.0%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 11 4.3%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 1,314
  • 23
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top