wasted years
Member
- Location
- Cumbrian born and bread
You've missed the point of Tom's post.i really fail to see any relevance of the sex of the president here - the best person for the job should be elected
You've missed the point of Tom's post.i really fail to see any relevance of the sex of the president here - the best person for the job should be elected
Are you still in touch,and get much feed back?That is the most interesting bit about politics,to hear at first hand what goes on,and to try and get to know what they really think off record.I have a friend who I have known since his pre-MP days and who is now in government; I've seen him go from being utterly flattened by constant heavy criticism (nearly to the point of despair), to being furious about it, to being amused by it, to where he is now, which is mildly interested with a measure of contempt for the critics, but no more.
He is a good and decent man so will admit, privately, that as a public representative he should be, and has little right not to be, less dismissive of such people. But, being human, it's just how he feels. If you do get the top job, and do want to re-establish the NFU's credibility, membership and effectiveness, please recognise that repeating the wrong answer won't make it right. Nevertheless, you make a fair point.
Good luck.
By Friday I bet the only headlines will be either "NFU elects first female President" or "NFU fails to elect first female President".
i really fail to see any relevance of the sex of the president here - the best person for the job should be elected
You've missed the point of Tom's post.
Yes, What Tom is saying is that if the election was held before the conference then the question of whether the new President has a cock or not can be overshadowed by what would hopefully be a successful first speech by whoever won, pertinent to the issues of the day, week, month or year.Really ?
Whats qualifies them to be the best person for the job?i really fail to see any relevance of the sex of the president here - the best person for the job should be elected
Whats qualifies them to be the best person for the job?
Experience?
Likeability?
Cross sector joined up thinking?
Best speaker?
Common sense,then the best speaker/interviewee who can think of a pertinent/articulate/meaningful reply in a split second.Whats qualifies them to be the best person for the job?
Experience?
Likeability?
Cross sector joined up thinking?
Best speaker?
number 1 important theses days is being VERY media savy - just look at our last few PM's Blair was shite but christ did he understand how to play the media game
Agree.Paxman cites Blair and Clinton as the sharpest interviewees he had.Jim Turner had the speaking ability apparently,but then he was president in an "easy" era when food and farming was wanted.When the age of plenty arrived,he found Westminster and politics a much more unfriendly place.(Hope Guy Smith reads this because he wrote a piece about Turner in the Farmers Weekly a few months ago)all of the above and much more
number 1 important theses days is being VERY media savy - just look at our last few PM's Blair was shite but christ did he understand how to play the media game
perception matters more than reality these days, i'm not saying that's a good thing but it is the world we live in
So did ICan non nfu members vote?
We now see each other probably three or four time each year, speak every month or so and e-mail every few weeks, sometimes more often, sometimes less. We used to have a drink together at least every other week, even when he was a humble backbencher, but the thing is, quite apart from my having moved back to Wales, he simply has no free time now, none at all.Are you still in touch,and get much feed back?That is the most interesting bit about politics,to hear at first hand what goes on,and to try and get to know what they really think off record.
he bares up well.
Since his first promotion I've never seen him more than 'merry', and then fast asleep; but, yes, before that he did like a few, and then a few more. However, as I wrote above, he just has so little time now and what he does get is spent with family, or sleeping.
Bet he beers up well, too, if anything like the two or three MPs of my acquaintance.
I will vote for whoever actually has the balls to recognize that the RT assurance is a scam.......... that leaves one candidate out, as one of them hasn't got a pair and is on the RT board peddling this constant 'Farm to Fork' traceability lie !
Good luck to the other candidate ........
... would that be this one wanting the Red Tractor mark to get the promotional budget it needs:
http://www.fwi.co.uk/farm-life/guy-smith-recognised-by-rase-for-communications-work.htm
see this on the bottom of the article ? > ' What do you think of Mr Smith’s thoughts? Let us know on the forums'
WTF .......... not communicating well with 90% of farmers then !
I'll vote for 'None of the Above' in that case !
would promotion be a bad thing ?... would that be this one wanting the Red Tractor mark to get the promotional budget it needs:
http://www.fwi.co.uk/farm-life/guy-smith-recognised-by-rase-for-communications-work.htm