Finn farmer
Member
As the title says. Our 2014 Polaris Sportsman 570 was a sorry excuse of a quad. On wednesday we went to pick it up from the repair shop (as usual), drove it in our van and just jokingly asked how much would it cost us to change to Can-am Outlander 570 Pro+. We got the price, talked about it outside and decided to push our Polaris back to the shops yard. Our 2020 Outlander should arrive next week.
Interesting thing is, we priced a Yamaha Kodiak 450 and 700 with almost the same equipment as Can-Am (wider and higher tyres, winch, eps, 60km/h tractor plates, belly plate) and the Kodiak 450 came in the same price as Can-am. Kodiak 700 was 2100€ more than Outlander, even though they are almost the same on paper. Outlander even has some "extra extras" baked in to the pro+ package (aluminum rims, the bigger tyres as standard, handlebar and throttle warmer).
I would've loved a Kodiak, but my love isn't enough to justify the extra cost. Time will tell, as they say. I might even buy a smaller Outlander 450 for my private use if the 570 Pro+ proves reliable and nice to drive.
It looks like this, but doesn't have the horrendous backrest, since we had the one that has only legal seating for driver.
Interesting thing is, we priced a Yamaha Kodiak 450 and 700 with almost the same equipment as Can-Am (wider and higher tyres, winch, eps, 60km/h tractor plates, belly plate) and the Kodiak 450 came in the same price as Can-am. Kodiak 700 was 2100€ more than Outlander, even though they are almost the same on paper. Outlander even has some "extra extras" baked in to the pro+ package (aluminum rims, the bigger tyres as standard, handlebar and throttle warmer).
I would've loved a Kodiak, but my love isn't enough to justify the extra cost. Time will tell, as they say. I might even buy a smaller Outlander 450 for my private use if the 570 Pro+ proves reliable and nice to drive.
It looks like this, but doesn't have the horrendous backrest, since we had the one that has only legal seating for driver.