that';s working on the assumption that the asset is paid for, and not expected to be earning.AHA rents are supposed to be set on the income potential Of the farm, so if subs go, then I’d expect some downward reviews at arbitration.
Quite frankly, as a tenant, I don’t know what some owner occupiers are messing at, if they aren’t making a reasonable living. The rent I pay, would be a good living for someone .
there would be AHA landlords who, when major repairs come round, must have to dig deep.Shows sone serious level of bad business to loose money on owned land !
If they're debt free, then they plunder the war chest...if not.....
I do my utmost to ensure I'm a profitable tenant every year,
although I know of others -quoted elsewhere here too- who push their landlords to spend the rent on the farm.
In some cases, asking for capital expenditure they could never afford if the property was theirs, and many times the annual rent.
I would prefer if my landlord saw doing business with me as a means of income, rather than a (possibly resented) expenditure.