- Location
- Owaka, New Zealand
Perhaps they could experiment with 'new collection methods at the beehive'
So, tell me, is pasturisation a waste of time?
Our milk supplies contain waste matter and pesticides, and probably radioactive fallout? Have you got a shred of evidence for these claims? I find claims that the government and food standards agency are allowing food materials containing any of the listed contaminants into the food chain very dubious indeed. Should I write to my MP you think?
And anyway, how are these problems causing TB in badgers?
FFS, we have no nuclear power stations down here, hence your quote is irrelivant.
Oh bloody hell. Here we go again.
We are nuclear free down here, and have been for years, hence thats the reason why over the same period TB has dropped dramatically. Not our fault that the UK or EU doesn't follow our example!!!FonterraFarmer, not irrelevant, because if you remember Chernobyl, that was in Russia, but the UK still suffered from nuclear fall out. A russian woman I know, she had a white coat on her washing line, The day after it was all black. She did not understand why. Please, wake up from you deep nuclear sleep. John Wantling, Rochdale
It's ok. I feel sure he is going to bring some evidence for his ideas this time.
Where has our resident alternative scientist with no evidence to support his claims been since February 7th?
Answers on a postcard supplied by the Flat Earth Society please.
Where has our resident alternative scientist with no evidence to support his claims been since February 7th?
Answers on a postcard supplied by the Flat Earth Society please.
I guess he was having his medication doses adjusted.
It doesn't seem to have worked.
It's ok. I feel sure he is going to bring some evidence for his ideas this time.
Linga, I have offered you a pot of gold, but you wont take it. You want me to do your thinking for you, whilst you defend the indefensible. Teacher in school teaches the children from an infectious book. The children take it in, the infectious program is installed into their brains. The book is a fraud, but no one can see it. So the children all grow up and believe in this book. This is what has happened, we all have faith in that infectious book, but there is something wrong, no mode of transmission. This wantling fellow points this out, he says that the scientific experiment has failed. He asks, why place your faith in a failed experiment? You laugh in his face. But why do you think that there is a parliamentary bTB debate due in March, followed by a symposium? The reason is because they are still trying to make sense out of the senseless. They have had endless debates in the past, but they can never solve anything when they focus on the wrong (environmental) bacteria. They cannot solve a thing whilst they deny the internal metamorphosis. This wantling fellow points this out, but no one can possible imagine in their wildest dreams that he is right. I suggest you stand outside Imperial College and pat all the theoreticians on the back when they enter. Prostrate yourself and thank them for dreaming up a science that slaughters your animals that remain healthy. At the end of the day, I may be as mad as a hatter, but its your cows that are being slaughtered. John Wantling, Rochdale
Linga, we pick up a newspaper and we watch the BBC news which says that a little girl in Portugal is kidnapped. We believe what we are being told, but this is media hype. We all believe that this hype is true, we all feel sorry for the parents. The police focus upon the kidnap theory, the investigation costs millions of pounds. But then someone makes a film that says that the girl was never kidnapped, that she died in the apartment. Now we have a different story, so what do we do? Do we defend the hype, which we see as real, which is our knowledge, which is a historic 'fact', or do we take a look at this other theory. If we defend the hype, then we will be wrong if the different story happens to be real. This means that we need to put our thinking caps on, which is what Wendy Murphy has done. This means we need to look at the evidence. When we follow the leader, we will be lost. We need to ask ourselves, do we follow, because if we do, then our thoughts (science) will be based upon something that isn't true. Now we have to apply those same rules to bovine TB. We have the hype, but we now have a different story that explains the hype. But no one wants to hear that different story. That is a big problem. Self-deception based on bad science is now ruling the waves. This is the falsification of history. John Wantling, Rochdale
McCLIP - Wendy Murphy Former US Prosecutor "I'm not buying it.."
So if, and from NZ it's a very big if, IF this academia and infectious thinking is wrong, how did our tb controls prove so effective here?
(Sorry UK farmers, I'm definitely not saying that to rub salt in)
We based our control methods on the very 'assumptions' that are being discredited here, and it worked.. worked well in fact.