Storeman
Member
- Location
- South East Englandshire
Storeman, like I say, you don't want to do your own work. You always want to follow the leader, whilst you fall asleep. I have sent Professor Krebs a letter, but no one can possibly believe what I am saying. Professor Krebs has his own conflicts of interest that prevent him from seeing clearly. Under these circumstance, that we all deny, he may well support a 'science' that makes grand assumptions, based on theory minus fact. You farmers are easy meat, you will absorb anything that academia says, you follow like lost sheep. You say, academia cannot possibly make a mistake, but underneath we all know that they have made a mistake but no one can say that because it is a taboo. If we say that, we will be finished, an outcast, mad as a hatter. You create your own world. I point out these harsh realities that you cannot ever face. John Wantling, Rochdale
So, you say we are wrong and that there is no such thing as infection. We have been blindly led up a both of incorrect science that is just a theory. Thing is, infection DOES exist, it is not a theory, it has been known about for hundreds of years. The history of the world is intertwined with the impact that infectious diseases have had on populations. Evidence of smallpox has been found in 3000-year-old Egyptian mummies. Egyptian papyrus paintings depict infectious diseases such as poliomyelitis. Hippocrates wrote about the spread of disease by means of airs, water, and places. Investigators described miasmas as the source of infections. Fracastoro discussed the germ theory in the 1500s and three routes of contagion were proposed—direct contact, fomites, and contagion from a distance (airborne). Epidemics of leprosy, plague, syphilis, smallpox, cholera, yellow fever, typhoid fever, and other infectious diseases were the norm.
Just because you don't believe it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Science proves it does. If you can't understand this, then it is you that has a problem, not the rest of us.
You say that there is no known mode of transmission, so therefore no such thing as infection. Yet you have no proof of your ramblings on the subject, so if we apply your 'logic', you are also wrong.
Take gravity. Is it a particle? We don't know. Is it a wave? Again, we don't know. Now, going with your reasoning, if we don't know, it can't exist. But, gravity does exist (I wouldn't be surprised if you deny the existence of gravity).
You claim the experts have 'made a mistake', but have no proof whatsoever of this mistake. It is you that can't face the realities, you are the outcast, you are as mad as a hatter.
You need to face up to the fact that anyone with an ounce of intelligence is laughing at you John. You are just a rambling conspiracy theorist, who has no knowledge of the science you are trying to debunk. You have no known mode of intelligence.
Just thought I'd point out these harsh realities that you cannot face or accept.