Exfarmer
Member
- Location
- Bury St Edmunds
I can assure you NATO has had no part in Somalia. The Russians yes, the US yes, possibly a range of Moslem states yes.But NATO exists for precisely the reason I mentioned and is backed by states who have nuclear weapons.
If NATO already exists and has done so, ensuring the peace for 50 odd years, what then does the EU want with an army?
Much criticism has been directed at NATO but it has clearly worked and has cooperated closely on a few missions which were not within the Soviet/Russian sphere- i.e. Kosovo/Bosnia, USA (9/11 attack counter terror effort), Somalia, Afghanistan, etc.
I don't see the need for an EU army and I think the very existence of one would be inflammatory toward the Russians. NATO does not really serve any political master, and a member state might not take part in every operation (some of them can't as they have limited assets). I'm very dubious about what an EU army would be for and who would command it.