FonterraFarmer
Member
- Location
- Waikato, New Zealand
You could say that about just about any country.Hopefully Putin will fall out of a window and a more sensible leader emerges
The UK is no exception, allegedly.
You could say that about just about any country.Hopefully Putin will fall out of a window and a more sensible leader emerges
We’re not close to properly supporting them though are we, why is that?A general invasion of Europe isn't going to happen, France definitely would go nuclear if its homeland was threatened and even in a purely conventional war Russia would have the living sh!t kicked out of it, and knows it.
But... if Ukraine is not given the necessary to ensure Russia loses there, a series of small 'pecking' operations are not unlikely. I think Moldova would be the first target and, if all went well there, that a few pokes at one of the Baltic states would be next.
Yet NATO has to be seen to be resolute as well as effective; my guess is that Estonia would be the first target, being 30% ethnic Russian. I don't suggest that Russia would openly attack a NATO member, but I'd not be surprised if it were to encourage and support secessionists in the East, nor if 'little green men' were seen there. And then, when there was a a pretend state formed, Russia would act formally; but it would be a very cautious series of escalating steps.
What will stop this? Properly supporting Ukraine now.
The UK isn't invading anyoneYou could say that about just about any country.
The UK is no exception, allegedly.
for a changeThe UK isn't invading anyone
you obviously do not spend much time on US politics, not heard that Trump is regularly threatening to leave NATO.Putin isn't stupid enough to attack NATO.
The US military machine is too big. If the US really thought Ukraine was critical to world stability they would be doing more, don't you think?
Best keep dripping supply's in to Ukraine then to keep them busy thereyou obviously do not spend much time on US politics, not heard that Trump is regularly threatening to leave NATO.
Without the US, NATO is mainly a bunch of toothless old women who would soon retreat behind their front doors if the bear comes knocking. Even now we are running very short of arms and ammunition and we have very little military manufacturing left. Russia could blockade the Atlantic shipping to prevent realistic re supply from American manufacturers and that would rely on the Chinese not attacking Taiwan at the same time.
I do not think for one minute that Russia will attack across a wide area, but the obvious start will be taking the corridor to Kaliningrad. Then moving up through the Baltic states.
The problem is , that is what we have been doing far too slowly, mainly due to the fact we do not have the back up ammunition and equipment we once did.Best keep dripping supply's in to Ukraine then to keep them busy there
But I am sure between the "west"ern countries enough can be found to keep them plugging away in Ukraine for a few more years by then perhaps putin will fall of his perch or out of a window.The problem is , that is what we have been doing far too slowly, mainly due to the fact we do not have the back up ammunition and equipment we once did.
Think we only have about 50 serviceable tanks, not long ago it was 350 and 40 years ago it was well into 4 figures
1. Trump isn't president.you obviously do not spend much time on US politics, not heard that Trump is regularly threatening to leave NATO.
Without the US, NATO is mainly a bunch of toothless old women who would soon retreat behind their front doors if the bear comes knocking. Even now we are running very short of arms and ammunition and we have very little military manufacturing left. Russia could blockade the Atlantic shipping to prevent realistic re supply from American manufacturers and that would rely on the Chinese not attacking Taiwan at the same time.
I do not think for one minute that Russia will attack across a wide area, but the obvious start will be taking the corridor to Kaliningrad. Then moving up through the Baltic states.
Where will the money come from in western countries we and other countries cant afford lot hospital care etc you could see some pubic reaction if public spending is cut putin and his buddies can do it no one will dare complainThe Poles have been building up their military capacity the last few years.
You really need to read up on Putin, he has been saying for a number of years that he will take Russia back to its old borders, just like Hitler, appeasement will only encourage and strengthen his hand.1. Trump isn't president.
2. When he was, he didn't leave NATO.
3. He did complain about the contributions of other NATO countries, as have previous presidents (in less shouty ways)
4. The Ukraine war has seen other countries up their financial commitments in defence, it has been very beneficial to the US in this regard, (guess where they buy a lot of their equipment from)
5. The US will not pull its military out of Europe; their whole defense strategy is to keep any threat to its own country thousands of miles away.
6. I'm glad you've figured out that it is America that completely controls what happens in the war, I get shouted at when I mention it.
7. To repeat myself, Russia is NOT attacking NATO.
Russia isn't doing anything; they can't advance in Ukraine a few miles from their own border.You really need to read up on Putin, he has been saying for a number of years that he will take Russia back to its old borders, just like Hitler, appeasement will only encourage and strengthen his hand.
Zelensky is looking for another half million to chuck in to the meat grinder. Glad you will be stepping up.You really need to read up on Putin, he has been saying for a number of years that he will take Russia back to its old borders, just like Hitler, appeasement will only encourage and strengthen his hand.
It is increasingly a huge issue which we need to face urgently. Drones warfare has totally changed the outlook. simple very cheap drones flown in Swarms can have a devastating effect on cities. ou only option at the moment is relying on ultra sophisticated technology. Currently in the Gulf the Americans are using missiles which cost £11 million each, to take out drones which Iran is supplying at a £1,000 a time.From a warehouse/storage PoV, the west must be getting low on ordinance - we know Russia depends on India for oil exports and China for supplies. So, question. Anyone got any reason why the EU should get an army afterall?.
What choice do they have, given the fact that the West isn't supplying them with the equipment they need. The West has now had 2 years to put its armaments industries onto a war footing and supply Ukraine with what it needs, which it has mostly failed to do.Zelensky is looking for another half million to chuck in to the meat grinder. Glad you will be stepping up.
Ukraine military seeks extra 500,000 soldiers - President Zelensky
Ukraine's leader admits mobilisation is a sensitive and costly issue as the war with Russia nears two-year mark.www.bbc.com
To be fair to Europe it did appear that the Russian bear was prepared to go down the path of Peace for mutual benefit. Trade has had a huge affect on the Russian economy and many of its population have done extremely well and not just the Oligarchs. The problem is that Putin whilst embracing democracy at first realised that a new government would seek to recover the vast sums of wealth that he and his friends have stolen from the people. Muskovites have done very well but so much of the country lives in abject poverty and the message was getting out there thanks to some very determined people . However much Putin tried the resistance to his government increased despite a massive operation to suppress the media.Russia isn't doing anything; they can't advance in Ukraine a few miles from their own border.
The US may have decided Ukraine isn't vital (or Russia is weaker than expected) but they won't let Russia expand into countries like Poland or Germany. I don't care what Putin wants, he like the rest of us are controlled by the US. They will put him back in his box if he gets too ambitious.
Remember it was Europe that was getting too friendly with Russia at the start of all this with their energy dependency.
That's why Biden said the pipeline would go and it's gone.
Borris should never have talked him out of the deal that was on the table with Russia at the start of the war. He was trying to be churchill without having a clue what he was getting them in to.What choice do they have, given the fact that the West isn't supplying them with the equipment they need. The West has now had 2 years to put its armaments industries onto a war footing and supply Ukraine with what it needs, which it has mostly failed to do.
Very much a case of Winston Churchill's famous quote: “Give Us the Tools, and We Will Finish the Job”.
You seriously believe that. Apart from the conditions Russia put down: Legal recognition for Russia's annexation of Crimea, independence of Luhansk and Donetsk, as well as demilitarisation and "de-Nazification" of Ukraine. It doesn't take must to see that "demilitarisation and "de-Nazification" would equate the Russia carrying out mass genocide inside a helpless Ukraine.Borris should never have talked him out of the deal that was on the table with Russia at the start of the war. He was trying to be churchill without having a clue what he was getting them in to.