- Location
- Devon
The NFU have been the mainstay of our industry for over a century and we have all benefited from its existence.
Nobody would agree with everything they have done and I'm sure many think they should have been far more successful on some issues.
Whether you are a supporter of Red Tractor or otherwise, you must find their conduct in that respect rather confusing.
This has been troubling me for some time and I have finally thought of a rational explanation.
NFU mutual took about £850 million from farmers in insurance premiums in 2020. If they considered some of those requirements within RT reduced their liabilities, it could be worth £8.5 million for each percentage reduction.
The question is, are the policies and actions of the NFU being manipulated by NFU mutual?
With £20.8 billion of funds under management, some of the NFU's lobbying could make a big difference financially.
It might also explain the way they have always opposed a cap to payments. NFU mutual own £1.576 billion of land and buildings, maybe the cap would affect them.
We all know that NFU mutual have influence over local agents and heavily sponsor the NFU in a way that we would be very suspicious of it was any other organisation. But as the group chief executive says,"like all good farmers, we have been diversifying our risks and opportunities, resulting in a fairly even 50/50 split in our total premiums between farm and non-farm business", they don't have any priority to look after farming.
So is it the case that the NFU are brilliant at serving the interests of its farming members, except when otherwise directed by the money men at the mutual?
Nobody would agree with everything they have done and I'm sure many think they should have been far more successful on some issues.
Whether you are a supporter of Red Tractor or otherwise, you must find their conduct in that respect rather confusing.
This has been troubling me for some time and I have finally thought of a rational explanation.
NFU mutual took about £850 million from farmers in insurance premiums in 2020. If they considered some of those requirements within RT reduced their liabilities, it could be worth £8.5 million for each percentage reduction.
The question is, are the policies and actions of the NFU being manipulated by NFU mutual?
With £20.8 billion of funds under management, some of the NFU's lobbying could make a big difference financially.
It might also explain the way they have always opposed a cap to payments. NFU mutual own £1.576 billion of land and buildings, maybe the cap would affect them.
We all know that NFU mutual have influence over local agents and heavily sponsor the NFU in a way that we would be very suspicious of it was any other organisation. But as the group chief executive says,"like all good farmers, we have been diversifying our risks and opportunities, resulting in a fairly even 50/50 split in our total premiums between farm and non-farm business", they don't have any priority to look after farming.
So is it the case that the NFU are brilliant at serving the interests of its farming members, except when otherwise directed by the money men at the mutual?