Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would say similar. I find speed is my friend where it’s a bit trashy.Definitely better, but not brilliant imho.
Ours blocked a bit into what was a tall crop of winter beans, straw chopped. Heavy disced, then in with combi, very dry conditions. Definitely blocked anywhere combine had been stopped, and dragged a few bean stalks around in rest of field. Kuhn, accord.
Fairly good improvement with rape, where only very light pressure on coulters. Don't know I'd fancy drilling cereals if soil was a bit damp and not flowing through drill.
Might just about have been worth spending the money on. Cheap to run compared to disc coulters, but disc coulters wpuld be a lot better.
Might work ok in the dry but any trash in wetter conditions will wrap round and they'll ride out onto the top . A disc drill is the best option.How much better do three rows of Suffolk coulters handle trash versus two rows.
Is it worth retro fitting a third row?
I understand the newer disc coulters are very good, the Amazone Rotec and Kuhn SeedFlex etc.Might work ok in the dry but any trash in wetter conditions will wrap round and they'll ride out onto the top . A disc drill is the best option.
Give tim smith a call , went for a few bits couple weeks ago ,sure he had a disc coulter bar ,in yardThanks for the replies, think I will retro fit a third row of coulters.
Yeah they're pretty rubbish.I understand the newer disc coulters are very good, the Amazone Rotec and Kuhn SeedFlex etc.
I've used an old Accord with CX discs and a Kuhn with a similar disc, and they were both poor in stony and cloddy conditions, just rode out the ground and left seed on the surface, an instance where suffolk coulters worked better.