- Location
- Scottish Highlands
I think it was Finn Farmer who had a very impressive system stacking bales on large pallets. Anyone got a link?
NnnoooooYou think the trailed 56 ones are problematic. You should try the mounted 40 bale ones.
Great thingsJust thinking out aloud...
Those 56 bale handlers, that take a cube of flat 8 stacked bales, are they any good at their job, or best avoided?
Can you send me your number if theyre still available. Mine is +353876044000.I've got 2 for sale .
Sold them .Can you send me your number if theyre still available. Mine is +353876044000.
Logic one here, griping bars hinged in the middle so equal pressure from front to back and does not need a center pole.I had a Browns one once. I found that because the arms were pivoted at the front, there was more squeeze pressure at the back than at the front so as I picked up the stack, I would sometimes lose some from the bottom row. To counteract that I welded on some short spikes in the centre.
My neighbour had a Chillington bale carrier and that had arms that only went half way. On the inside at the arm ends, there were hinges to which were attached a full length arms. The effect of that was that the squeeze pressure was the same at back as at the front. I don't recall him having much trouble.
Proof if it were needed for the youngsters, that there was a time when fert was cheap enough to leave spilt on the ground.This is the safest way to move weeView attachment 884096 bales any distance, (see pic) but I’m fairly sure a 56 carrier would be grand for @Selectamatic
You think the trailed 56 ones are problematic. You should try the mounted 40 bale ones.