Countryside stewardship extension offer

Huno

Member
Arable Farmer
To clarify

By "brand new agreement" I mean a new agreement with identical terms to the previous (expiring) agreement which would therefore mirror the expiring agreement, but actually be a brand new agreement
Its the old agreement under new rules!! It cant be a mirror because multi annual 2yr options are not divisable by 5.. yet again Maths and DEFRA are completly lacking as they cant count to 5!!!
 

Huno

Member
Arable Farmer
Luckily it would stand 5 minutes scrutiny from a proper Ag Barrister so if you like their offer just sign up until the next round of nonsense is published by DEFRA...
 

steveR

Member
Mixed Farmer
I am concerned that, if RPA successfuly claim that there is a breach of an EXTENDED agreement, they could impose penalties right back to the start date of our original agreement in 1998.

How is it possible to avoid this possibility? I am happy that RPA might be able to go back to the start of a NEW agreement, but not that they could go right back to 1998.

An earlier post refers to a MIRROR agreement? What does this mean? Is it just another name for an EXTENSION (which is now being offered) or is a brand new agreement with identical terms to the previous agreememt, with a break between the old and the new agreements?

Has anyone any experience of a brand new agreement (not an extension) which would therefore limit the RPA's ability to go back further than the start date of the new agreement?
I queried this with the NE Adviser who "offered" me an extension, and she confirmed at that time, that this issue of backdated penalties was a concern to some Farmers to such an extent that the offers were not being taken up.... She was not willing to offer me any reassurance that Penalties would NOT start from 2000 (in my case) in the event of a breach being found. Having already had an expensive visit from a less than truthful Inspector 2 years previous, I was less than enthusiastic...

Apparently, a farmer could also potentially be found in breach of the same error on a 2n occasion, and have penalties backdated to the original start of the Agreement again too!

I refused the Offer.... ;)
 
Last edited:
I wouldnt touch any Stewardship ever now - I graze some steward land thats now out of scheme - it supported dairy in the 90's. I could handle a good forage crop in summer and sustain sheep through winter, decent grazing.

HLS restrictions have rendered it producing rough crap hay in of low yeild, and sheep cant thrive on it, in reality they loose form without supplementing which isnt allowed........... only achived by feeding in a neighbouring feild with open gate. Its free so I take it, its somewhere to put culls before they go.

In reality CS does not in anyway pay enough at todays rates to even come near the loss of production profit and income that it causes, plus In many cases you end the agrement but find they still have you by the balls on grassland - Lime it afterwards and they will say its damaging a habitat - if your on the wrong side of them, or you get a keen NE eco numpty, your basically screwed.

Your far better spending a few quid and Liming your land, even the crappest rough ground, with lime added is going to have a revenue boost greater than many CS options.

Throw in some fertility and better management.........

Obviously moorland and some harder farms are a different kettle of fish - Im not suggesting someone in the lakes or high dales can turn their fell into good ground!
 

Ceri

Member
Whats everyone worried about………???Janet Hughes has insisted that “inspections” are now over & will be called “visits”instead where we all laugh, talk & joke round the kitchen table before they just merely offer us advice….
The RPA “visitors” are our new besties 😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍
 

Socksitis

Member
I queried this with the NE Adviser who "offered" me an extension, and she confirmed at that time, that this issue of backdated penalties was a concern to some Farmers to such an extent that the offers were not being taken up.... She was not willing to offer me any reassurance that Penalties would NOT start from 2000 (in my case) in the event of a breach being found. Having already had an expensive visit from a less than truthful Inspector 2 years previous, I was less than enthusiastic...

Apparently, a farmer could also potentially be found in breach of the same error on a 2n occasion, and have penalties backdated to the original start of the Agreement again too!

I refused the Offer.... ;)
As I understand, we have now moved HLS agreements from the EU to UK legislation and therefore, there is no backdating of penalties before 1st January 2023. I understood this to be a key move in being able to offer 5 year roll overs.
I totally agree with the highlighted phrases that @Huno has made.
The only way out of an HLS 5 year roll over without penalties, is by entering another scheme of equal merit.
 

Socksitis

Member
@Janet Hughes Defra will Natural England have to issue 5 year SSSI consent to 5 year HLS roll overs, or will NE not permit a five year HLS roll over because they do not feel they can offer a five year SSSI consent?

I am concerned that many of our common land agreements will be lost because NE will not offer five year SSSI consents.

A one year rolling SSSI consent will not be adequate in a five year HLS scheme due to potential penalties of leaving the HLS 5 year scheme early.

How can we ensure common land agreements are offered five year roll overs and five SSSI consents are granted?
 

Stw88

Member
Location
Northumberland
@Janet Hughes Defra will Natural England have to issue 5 year SSSI consent to 5 year HLS roll overs, or will NE not permit a five year HLS roll over because they do not feel they can offer a five year SSSI consent?

I am concerned that many of our common land agreements will be lost because NE will not offer five year SSSI consents.

A one year rolling SSSI consent will not be adequate in a five year HLS scheme due to potential penalties of leaving the HLS 5 year scheme early.

How can we ensure common land agreements are offered five year roll overs and five SSSI consents are granted?
These sssi consents boil my p*ss, why on earth do we have to apply to natural England to get permission to go into a scheme that they have written and approved! More unnecessary paperwork to keep some civil servants in a job!
 

Socksitis

Member
These sssi consents boil my p*ss, why on earth do we have to apply to natural England to get permission to go into a scheme that they have written and approved! More unnecessary paperwork to keep some civil servants in a job!
SSSI consent are now the only way that NE can control schemes as they are run by the RPA.
They are a manipulative tool rather than anything benefical.
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 107 39.9%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 98 36.6%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 40 14.9%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 1.9%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 4 1.5%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 14 5.2%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 2,604
  • 49
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top