Exfarmer
Member
- Location
- Bury St Edmunds
If they used a Claas wobble box on those French built machines, that would have no relationship to the older MF boxes. To be fair I Am certain that MF did upgrade the wobble box over the years and it was the earlier ones that gave them so much trouble. Our local dealer always had a couple of refurbished boxes on the shelf.Hi,
I had a 565 for about twenty years! I changed it for a 29XP which was OK being a hydro but some of the parts on it were an absolute B****d to work on.
The 565 was much easier in that respect.
Cab was damn noisy though especially with field peas rattling around as well.
Some people have mentioned the wobble box may be a problem but as far as I remember it was a Claas part.
I had some trouble with hydraulic safety poppet valves at one point. They had a small nylon type sweat that could split preventing the circuit operating.
The vario pulley needs care But most of the stuff was basic maintenance really.
One of the motivations for changing it was that the second hand parts I was sourcing were often no better than what I had. Our machine was 1984 and that was around the end of production. All the breaker yard stuff had been well hammered already.
As far as i can remember the machine was a sort of hybrid between the 525 and the 665. The running gear and chassis were more of the 665 style but i think it was effectively one straw Walker narrower than the 665.
My old machine was sold in good order down to the West Country. However I think the transport lorry driver must have dragged it under every low tree between South Norfolk and it’s new home. Although some of the blame must have rested with the purchaser for sending a normal flat bed lorry trailer rather than a low loader.
A.