We can finally take advantage of our freedom outside the EU - Iain Duncan Smith

Steevo

Member
Location
Gloucestershire
We can finally take advantage of our freedom outside the EU
Britain's newfound independence presents the country with myriad opportunities to reshape how we do things across the economy
IAIN DUNCAN SMITH30 January 2021 • 9:30pm
Iain Duncan Smith


It is a year to the day since the UK left the European Union, and one month since the new Trade and Cooperation Agreement took effect and the Transition Period ended, signalling the return of the UK to the world stage as an independent nation once again.
Despite what the naysayers have said, their worst predictions have not come to pass – goods continue to flow freely and our ports have not ground to a halt.
Importantly the deal the Prime Minister secured delivered on what many dismissed as impossible, that the UK and its institutions could once again be fully independent.
As the source of UK sovereignty is within our country and not outside, for the first time in over forty years we are truly able to make vital choices for the British people and ensure we act in their interests.
This newfound independence presents the country with myriad opportunities to reshape how we do things across the economy.
As the Government seeks to build back better and recover from the impacts of the pandemic, there has never been a more important time to consider the options available to us to stimulate business dynamism and innovation, ensure that our markets are open and competitive and that businesses can scale up unencumbered by any unnecessary administrative burdens.
So it is a privilege to have been asked by the Prime Minister to lead the new Taskforce for Innovation and Growth through Regulatory Reform.
The group has been convened to scope out and propose options for how the UK can take advantage of our newfound regulatory freedoms outside the EU.
Alongside my colleagues Theresa Villiers and George Freeman, we will consider options we think will drive innovation, reduce barriers to entry and growth, cut red tape for business, and support growth right across our economy.
We will engage with parliamentarians, business leaders and policymakers, and report back to the Prime Minister before the end of April with our findings.
We are not trying to find areas to deregulate for the sake of it.
Our approach will differ from previous forays in this area, not least because our departure from the EU has greatly widened the range of policy options available.
We will start by setting out a new approach to over complicated regulation emanating from the EU, a situation often exacerbated by the fact that the CJEU had become a supranational lawmaker.
We will also focus on 21st century industries where the UK can, with the right regime, have a cutting-edge advantage.
We are now free to find ways to reduce administrative barriers to scaling up productive businesses; and to tailor any necessary processes to the needs of UK start-ups and SMEs.
When we were tied into the EU, regulations were constricting our key industries.
Brussels is too often motivated by producer interests rather than championing the consumer.
We have a real opportunity now to be nimble, and focus on SMEs instead of the EU’s one-size-fits-all approach which overwhelmingly favours big business.
Our taskforce will identify opportunities to drive innovation and accelerate the commercialisation and safe adoption of new technologies, cementing the UK’s position as a global science and technology superpower.
We can now firmly ground ourselves into a common law system where the assumption is to allow things rather than prohibit them.
The state should not be directing what businesses do – we should generally favour allowing things unless Parliament explicitly says no.
Such an approach is what will allow our nascent businesses – from AI to biotech – to thrive.
Brexit rests on fact that a modern economy needs to be relatively light on its feet and to ensure this, the UK has at last got the levers in our hands and be able to do what we need to. Sovereignty is not meaningless.
As a country we can now act further and set our rules in ways that suits us. And we are excited to be helping realise this ambition, and to see our businesses flourish unshackled from the EU.


 
2 months ago, I could have exported pedigree breeding heifers to N Ireland via Holyhead no problem. Now no haulier wants the job as there are no lairage facilities at either Holyhead or Stranraer (sp?) for pre boat health checks as NI is still subject to EU rules

Fantastic
And any animal coming to the mainland from NI for a show or sale has to stay for 6 months before it can return to NI

But don't you know that things are flowing freely 🤦‍♂️
 

le bon paysan

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Limousin, France
2 months ago, I could have exported pedigree breeding heifers to N Ireland via Holyhead no problem. Now no haulier wants the job as there are no lairage facilities at either Holyhead or Stranraer (sp?) for pre boat health checks as NI is still subject to EU rules

Fantastic
 

topground

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
North Somerset.
They need to root out those elements of the civil service who do not have a can do attitude and deal with gold plating of existing legislation to please minority interest pressure groups. The recent moves to ruin the livestock industry by unnecessary changes to WATO are a recent example as is the conduct of FAnGR in their interpretation of Regulation EU 2016/1012 Animal breeding.
 

pgk

Member
Livestock Farmer
They need to root out those elements of the civil service who do not have a can do attitude and deal with gold plating of existing legislation to please minority interest pressure groups. The recent moves to ruin the livestock industry by unnecessary changes to WATO are a recent example as is the conduct of FAnGR in their interpretation of Regulation EU 2016/1012 Animal breeding.
You seem to ignore the fact that civil servants work to the ministers, thus if the minister does not want it gold plated it won't be, we must therefore conclude either the ministers are not on top of their brief or they want the gold plating.
 

le bon paysan

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Limousin, France
2 months ago, I could have exported pedigree breeding heifers to N Ireland via Holyhead no problem. Now no haulier wants the job as there are no lairage facilities at either Holyhead or Stranraer (sp?) for pre boat health checks as NI is still subject to EU rules

Fantastic
This will thrill you, the only import facility planned for livestock? They must be wrong and have one on the Wales Ireland route?
 

Martin Holden

Member
Trade
Location
Cheltenham
2 months ago, I could have exported pedigree breeding heifers to N Ireland via Holyhead no problem. Now no haulier wants the job as there are no lairage facilities at either Holyhead or Stranraer (sp?) for pre boat health checks as NI is still subject to EU rules

Fantastic
Yup! Just reading about the shellfish industry. Complete block on all experts to EU now as they are “live” food. While I fully understand the new rules isn’t it strange that when we were in the EU we could send all sorts to mainland Europe no problemo. Just shows what daft rules politicians come up with. Unfortunately these rules were created by the EU to protect their market and to an extent some other 3 world markets products may well not have met their standards BUT ours did. We could of course retaliate and ban imports of all sorts of European foods - 2 wrongs don’t make a right but a balance has to be set in order to make everyone see common sense. We were leaving with a free trade deal and these small print issues should have been part of the issue. Didn’t our administration grant free access to our market for the EU?
 

Y Fan Wen

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
N W Snowdonia
2 months ago, I could have exported pedigree breeding heifers to N Ireland via Holyhead no problem. Now no haulier wants the job as there are no lairage facilities at either Holyhead or Stranraer (sp?) for pre boat health checks as NI is still subject to EU rules

Fantastic
I think the Holyhead lairage facilities are now under the A55 Expressway which was built with EU TEN funding to facilitate the flow of traffic between 2 EU countries.
I was wandering round Siloth lairage facilities some years ago. There were young trees growing through the cracks in the concrete.
 

pgk

Member
Livestock Farmer
Yup! Just reading about the shellfish industry. Complete block on all experts to EU now as they are “live” food. While I fully understand the new rules isn’t it strange that when we were in the EU we could send all sorts to mainland Europe no problemo. Just shows what daft rules politicians come up with. Unfortunately these rules were created by the EU to protect their market and to an extent some other 3 world markets products may well not have met their standards BUT ours did. We could of course retaliate and ban imports of all sorts of European foods - 2 wrongs don’t make a right but a balance has to be set in order to make everyone see common sense. We were leaving with a free trade deal and these small print issues should have been part of the issue. Didn’t our administration grant free access to our market for the EU?
You will be pleased to know the UK were instrumental in drafting the third party country rules for the EU when within the Union, thus it can hardly come as a surprise to the government that as UK was not to stay in the single market, a choice of this government, the rules now apply to the UK as a third party country.
 

C.J

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
South Devon
You will be pleased to know the UK were instrumental in drafting the third party country rules for the EU when within the Union, thus it can hardly come as a surprise to the government that as UK was not to stay in the single market, a choice of this government, the rules now apply to the UK as a third party country.

And yet the Eu never created extra hurdles when trading with Switzerland and Norway :banghead:
 

topground

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
North Somerset.
You seem to ignore the fact that civil servants work to the ministers, thus if the minister does not want it gold plated it won't be, we must therefore conclude either the ministers are not on top of their brief or they want the gold plating.
You give Ministers far too much credit for being across all of their brief. Ministers simply do not have the time to read all of the papers the civil service produce, that is part of the game the civil service play, if they have a minister that wants to make his or her mark they will drown them in paperwork or otherwise make life difficult, Yes Minister was an accurate reflection of the way they work. The Civil Service can and do ruin the careers of Ministers who try to impose themselves and have a different agenda than the mandarins. Just look at what Pritti Patel has had to put up with because she wants things done her way.
 

Muck Spreader

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Limousin
Yup! Just reading about the shellfish industry. Complete block on all experts to EU now as they are “live” food. While I fully understand the new rules isn’t it strange that when we were in the EU we could send all sorts to mainland Europe no problemo. Just shows what daft rules politicians come up with. Unfortunately these rules were created by the EU to protect their market and to an extent some other 3 world markets products may well not have met their standards BUT ours did. We could of course retaliate and ban imports of all sorts of European foods - 2 wrongs don’t make a right but a balance has to be set in order to make everyone see common sense. We were leaving with a free trade deal and these small print issues should have been part of the issue. Didn’t our administration grant free access to our market for the EU?

I don't see what the problem is. Leavers voted for this level of separation from the EU and I was constantly told that Leavers were also well aware of all the consequences. So as soon as Mrs Brexit means Brexit said no customs union there was bound to be disruption and the UK government had 2-3 years to prepare which they failed to do. Basically they didn't want to spook the public by telling the truth until the last moment.
 

Will you help clear snow?

  • yes

    Votes: 68 31.6%
  • no

    Votes: 147 68.4%

The London Palladium event “BPR Seminar”

  • 12,592
  • 185
This is our next step following the London rally 🚜

BPR is not just a farming issue, it affects ALL business, it removes incentive to invest for growth

Join us @LondonPalladium on the 16th for beginning of UK business fight back👍

Back
Top