- Location
- North Wales
I'd say it is. There's only one kink per square. 22 would have 1 then 2 per square.is that 8/80/15 ?
I'd say it is. There's only one kink per square. 22 would have 1 then 2 per square.is that 8/80/15 ?
Ive looked hard and I cant find where posts cut from telegraph poles are excluded. Currently awaiting official answer / clarificationThe rule book doesn't allow leccy poles, which is daft, most will last far longer
Did you get a clarification ?Ive looked hard and I cant find where posts cut from telegraph poles are excluded. Currently awaiting official answer / clarification
Not yetDid you get a clarification ?
Spoken to several agents since who have handled many many applications and they all say I am worrying far too much- but it’s not their money at riskDid you get a clarification ?
Yes absolutely fine, I'd question why you'd want to thoughDoes anyone know if you are allowed to use box strainer assembly instead of angle stainer under FG2?
This is the reply I got from the RPA when I enquired about using box strainers:Does anyone know if you are allowed to use box strainer assembly instead of angle stainer under FG2?
That's frighteningThis is the reply I got from the RPA when I enquired about using box strainers:
"We apologise for the time it has taken for a response.
Countryside stewardship unfortunately will not let you use box strainers.
You must follow the specifications of 'Mortice struts into the straining post at an angle of no more than 45 degrees' even though you are stating it to be a higher spec unfortunately the requirements do not accept this if FG2 posts are built with a box strut method.
You must follow the guidance on the agreement and GOV.Uk website."
It took about 5 weeks to get this reply despite chasing on multiple occasions. We had already completed getting on for 2000m using box strainers prior to getting the above reply.
I'll have to read up the detail on this but are they saying it does not meet spec as it's over 45°'s ?This is the reply I got from the RPA when I enquired about using box strainers:
"We apologise for the time it has taken for a response.
Countryside stewardship unfortunately will not let you use box strainers.
You must follow the specifications of 'Mortice struts into the straining post at an angle of no more than 45 degrees' even though you are stating it to be a higher spec unfortunately the requirements do not accept this if FG2 posts are built with a box strut method.
You must follow the guidance on the agreement and GOV.Uk website."
It took about 5 weeks to get this reply despite chasing on multiple occasions. We had already completed getting on for 2000m using box strainers because they took so bloody long to reply on a time sensitive job.
Buy a few softwood sleepers purely for the receipt.I’m looking at putting up quite a lot of FG2 fencing; probably going to do a proper job so I’ll not have to revisit it so the £7.47/m will barely pay for materials (but certainly nice to have!).
The Requirements include:
View attachment 1142194
I’ve just bought some nice heavy sleepers for £30ea:
View attachment 1142195
Obviously they are not New new as per the spec, and they are likely some kind of hardwood not softwood as specd.
I can also get creosoted new softwood ‘sleepers’ for £45ea -my guess is that they won’t last as long.
Should I be playing safe and buying a more expensive, possibly inferior product or just go with the sleepers?
Thanks!
Below is part of the email I got from RPA querying if we could use telegraph poles for strainers and gateposts. It appears to say you can - but then others say the materials need to be new. My posts get a splash of creosote and hopefully look new in the photos and then invoices to back it up as aboveI’m looking at putting up quite a lot of FG2 fencing; probably going to do a proper job so I’ll not have to revisit it so the £7.47/m will barely pay for materials (but certainly nice to have!).
The Requirements include:
View attachment 1142194
I’ve just bought some nice heavy sleepers for £30ea:
View attachment 1142195
Obviously they are not New new as per the spec, and they are likely some kind of hardwood not softwood as specd.
I can also get creosoted new softwood ‘sleepers’ for £45ea -my guess is that they won’t last as long.
Should I be playing safe and buying a more expensive, possibly inferior product or just go with the sleepers?
Thanks!
That was part of our argument that the angle was less than 45° but still fell on deaf ears. All of mine was completed with box strainers in the end. Claim going in soon. Fingers crossedI'll have to read up the detail on this but are they saying it does not meet spec as it's over 45°'s ?
The horizontal strut to form the box will be at 0° and there fore less than 45°'s
Below is part of the email I got from RPA querying if we could use telegraph poles for strainers and gateposts. It appears to say you can - but then others say the materials need to be new. My posts get a splash of creosote and hopefully look new in the photos and then invoices to back it up as above
"FG12/FG2 can telegraph poles be used for both options, yes as long as it meets what is required under S2 in the agreement, where it goes in to details regarding the wood."That was part of our argument that the angle was less than 45° but still fell on deaf ears. All of mine was completed with box strainers in the end. Claim going in soon. Fingers crossed
We used box strainers and my claim has been rejected. I’ve been told I have to replace them with struts which is going to be a tight ball ache with an erected fence!That was part of our argument that the angle was less than 45° but still fell on deaf ears. All of mine was completed with box strainers in the end. Claim going in soon. Fingers crossed