I understand if 'names' are mentioned during a hearing/trial it is within the powers of the judge to impose reporting restrictions. The latter is not necessarily a 'cover up' but is often ordered for purpose of future exposure.Trying to find out more details about there case and if they where represented by a barrister at the trial or whether there will be an appeal. Seems to be very few details apart from the press release which smacks of a cover up. As you say Red Bull a bit to much of a coincidence for my liking.
Just an observation but as the crow flies the farm in question is within about a mile of what was the Phillips family farm. I was really sorry to learn of this sad affair.