Have they got one..?Well, obviously if she had done a shift in Lincoln City megastore....
Have they got one..?Well, obviously if she had done a shift in Lincoln City megastore....
Then I’d have been even prouder. But today I am able to offer to all forum members an array of Chelsea merchandise at a reasonable price however you may want to tape over the STAFF logo.Well, obviously if she had done a shift in Lincoln City megastore....
More of a market stall apparently you can get an away shirt and 4 stone of potatoes at the same time.Have they got one..?
The modern system with selective grammer schools and non grammer schools cannot be beaten
the kid from the non selective school do better than equivalent kids in an area with non selective system
And the Chelsea badgeThen I’d have been even prouder. But today I am able to offer to all forum members an array of Chelsea merchandise at a reasonable price however you may want to tape over the STAFF logo.
Apparently some people support them. I am not sure whether I would be more upset if she went on the game rather than working for Chelsea. Sunday she’s serving lunch at the Emirates she really has no shame.And the Chelsea badge
The modern system with selective grammar schools and non grammar schools cannot be beaten
the kid from the non selective school do better than equivalent kids in an area with non selective system
I am not clear what you are getting at here.
the other schools in those towns are also at a level higher than equivalent towns without grammer schoolsSouth Lincolnshire has some of the best grammar schools in the country Boston, Sleaford, Bourne and Grantham to name some not everyone is is their catchment area so they have to make other plans.
the selective system in the 1960s had major flawsI am not clear what you are getting at here.
I don’t think anyone says it is but generally a public school education gives the child a head start this could be because of the standard of education or because state schooling is poor. A certain South Lincolnshire Grammar school puts three times as many children into Oxford and Cambridge every year compared to a very smart Rutland public school but we can’t all move to Grantham.Just a spanner in the works…..
This toff-friendly education system isn’t exactly churning out the best results in the world
cheaper to move to grantham (sleaford boston spalding ect) than pay the school feesI don’t anyone says it is but generally a public school education gives the child a head start this could be because of the standard of education or because state schooling is poor. A certain South Lincolnshire Grammar school puts three times as many children into Oxford and Cambridge every year compared to a very smart Rutland public school but we can’t all move to Grantham.
Cheaper but not necessarily the best option. Education isn’t just exam results, though for £40,000 you need some reasonable ones. My investment though is in my children obviously you can give them the money you’ve saved however I am a great believer in the teach a man to fish philosophy rather than the give a man a fish one.cheaper to move to grantham (sleaford boston spalding ect) than pay the school fees
and if you do not make the grammerschool the other schools are very good plus the £250000 or more you could put in the bank (invest)
I think it is more British subservience to a toff. Two people of equal ability apply for a job one privately educated and one state school educated and employers favour the privately educated despite the fact that the state educated applicant probably had to work harder to achieve the same results. I probably should add that my wife was a teacher in a private school.I don’t think anyone says it is but generally a public school education gives the child a head start this could be because of the standard of education or because state schooling is poor. A certain South Lincolnshire Grammar school puts three times as many children into Oxford and Cambridge every year compared to a very smart Rutland public school but we can’t all move to Grantham.
I don’t know whether it’s subservience or what but I reckon you’re probably right what I will say is privately educated people in my opinion have a lot more confidence ( arrogance in cases). Again I believe a lot is to do with the parents as to how this comes out but it was one of the reasons we opted for private education.I think it is more British subservience to a toff. Two people of equal ability apply for a job one privately educated and one state school educated and employers favour the privately educated despite the fact that the state educated applicant probably had to work harder to achieve the same results. I probably should add that my wife was a teacher in a private school.
I am not sure that’s trueOther countries rank much higher on education results. And state funded too
Why does it only have to be private education with a few charity scraps ?
I don’t know whether it’s subservience or what but I reckon you’re probably right what I will say is privately educated people in my opinion have a lot more confidence ( arrogance in cases). Again I believe a lot is to do with the parents as to how this comes out but it was one of the reasons we opted for private education.