- Location
- Yorks
Couple of years back, inspector said if they passed too large a percentage of farmers, then RT would complain the inspection body wasn't doing their job correctly, then inspection body might lose their contract.
It's not exactly hard not to fail if you do whats required, just a lot of the records are in necessary or legal stuff already coveredCouple of years back, inspector said if they passed too large a percentage of farmers, then RT would complain the inspection body wasn't doing their job correctly, then inspection body might lose their contract.
they will only worry when the gravy slows downDo the clowns in charge not notice what's going on ,they must have a very blinkered vision or don't care
they will only worry when the gravy slows down
not enoughHasn't it already ?
In a slightly different context thats sort of what happened here in a way, A fairly local chap was inspecting for quit a few years, he was very knowledgeable and practical chap, who did his best to help those he inspected pass without any non conformances ,yes ,actually help them with how to go about it /comply with each change correct paperwork etc he would've had a very low failure rate i should think.Couple of years back, inspector said if they passed too large a percentage of farmers, then RT would complain the inspection body wasn't doing their job correctly, then inspection body might lose their contract.
So really she cold called you in a bid to get your hay customer contactsShe didn't come especially to us !!
She was in the area with her new job and called by more to see if we had any contacts for her in her new job as we used to supply a lot of hay to the horse industry . When she left after the RT inspection we did leave on decent terms but I was surprised to see her turn up in the yard .....
We did talk quite a lot about the RT inspection regime and I think ,to be fair, she realised that she was perhaps a bit 'too draconium' in her inspections but also said they were 'under pressure' to make it harder to pass !
One thing she commented on was that on the way back home to her horses she was mulling over it and the comment that I made " the way RT inspections are going you will soon be out of a job" made her realise that it wasn't the job for her .
Yes ....... but I'm quite pleased that she felt that she could ! .......was probably hoping the OH was in the house and not meSo really she cold called you in a bid to get your hay customer contacts
Half the population are quite happy to pick up their wages in exchange for sub-standard work so why pick on RT staff.
The clowns in charge are still happily riding the gravy train but now with a sharp eye and ear for any sign of derailment at which point there hoping to jump clear just in time and then amble into a fresh NFU backed position.Do the clowns in charge not notice what's going on ,they must have a very blinkered vision or don't care
Clearly many thousands of farmers now know that RT isn’t a legitimate company because farms still get inspected by government agencies for things that are written into law.
So my question is that all the staff must know that the RT business model is questionable, so do they have a clear conscience? Do they go to work happy? Do they come home from work happy?
Is it an unwritten part of the job description that you accept the business is effectively scaring farmers into paying RT in order to access a market they were already accessing prior to RT being created?
How do the staff feel about any come back on them down the line when it surely is all investigated, and this includes all the staff not just the senior positions. Is this why they can’t get staff at the moment? Have people realised but don’t want to talk about it?
Any RT staff wish to comment on here?
Hasn't it already ?
Half the population are quite happy to pick up their wages in exchange for sub-standard work so why pick on RT staff.
I don't know who does your Red Tractor assessment, but the ones we have had have certainly not bent any rules - in fact every "i" has to be dotted and every "t" crossed. Nit-picking in the extreme.Bend rules or just use common sense
I’ve certainly been failed for spurious reasons. Once at the very end of the inspection the inspector announced that she’d noticed a cow lacking one of its tags at the far end of the farm (she didn’t say anything about it at the time!) I wish I’d delayed her departure by dragging her back out there to check! There were no missing tags so I just had to swear that to the inspection body. I’m sure the inspector just did it to up her ‘fail’ rate.Couple of years back, inspector said if they passed too large a percentage of farmers, then RT would complain the inspection body wasn't doing their job correctly, then inspection body might lose their contract.
That's dreadful. You were failed so the inspection body hit its failure target!I’ve certainly been failed for spurious reasons. Once at the very end of the inspection the inspector announced that she’d noticed a cow lacking one of its tags at the far end of the farm (she didn’t say anything about it at the time!) I wish I’d delayed her departure by dragging her back out there to check! There were no missing tags so I just had to swear that to the inspection body. I’m sure the inspector just did it to up her ‘fail’ rate.
They once failed us for not having an operators manual for the drierThat's dreadful. You were failed so the inspection body hit its failure target!
That SHOULD NOT NE HAPPENING.
Which of the inspection companies was that, sounds like the sort of ballcocks for which CMI were infamous.They once failed us for not having an operators manual for the drier
bought second hand 25 years previously
and when sprayer testing first came out they tried to fail me for not having sprayer calibration records despite the fact the sprayer we had just bought hadn’t been used. On that occasion I refused to sign his paperwork and suggested he either delete it or leave.
on the most recent inspection I was asked for a combine service date. Told them I couldn’t give them one.
Why not?
well it took longer than a day to service
how many days?
well eerrr we started tinkering in January and finished the day we started so about 6 months!
so what date did you service it?
Just write every date down between jan and July I told them
they seem to get confused wen you tell the truth!
First 2 events we’re Cmi the last one was SAIWhich of the inspection companies was that, sounds like the sort of ballcocks for which CMI were infamous.
Had our inspection last week with whatever SAI call themselves now, with a courteous and pragmatic member of their team. Aside from populating a couple of templates, one for mass balance and one for something else, I didn't think the "new rules" particularly arduous. I had already downloaded the useful LkL services health and safety policy template, bish bash bosh job done for another year.
I have said before, be careful what replacement those of you hoping for complete abolition are wishing for.