As per normal @neilo right in what he says with so much of appearance down to management building up to sale day to hit it right. Probably the case in most pedigree sales but not all. Real top end price producers can get away with it for years as if they underperform for a few buyers there are plenty of under bidders wanting a part of it next year. However people quick to say every big sheep is down to feed. Found last few years I've gained a few buyers of mules from a competitor. He has quality but would be fed. People do learn occasionally though takes time. But had a friend stop with me last night that saw my sheep sold few weeks back. Helped draw and present them. Saw 40 we rejected that will be sold a week today. He laughed how much I must of fed them. Had half a pound for 3 weeks but on a bit of fresh grass. Many could dismiss these girls as stuffed but is genuinely there genetic potential to perform. Yes a mouthful to sparkle fleece and brighten them costs well under a pound and hopefully gain 5 quid. But potentially shows what prodginy can do with minimal help but great conversionI've no doubt he would have been an impressive looking individual on sale day, as are many of the mega-money sheep, including the subject of this thread. However, half of the appearance of these individuals on sale day is down to the management and the fettling that goes on to get them at 100% on the day that matters. What the animal's genetic potential is, is entirely another matter, and I would suggest, is of more importance?