• Welcome to The Farming Forum!

    As part of this update, we have made a change to the login and registration process. If you are experiences any problems, please email [email protected] with the details so we can resolve any issues.

Holding water in the hills

Not a solution of course, dredging is the solution.

But maybe combined with dredging, holding back water is part of the solution.

I don't own the land but in the high pennines there are many steep gullies some artifically made by "gripping" steep peat covered moors. Would it be possible to dam these with either dams with a pipe out of the bottom or a leaky dam.

Owners should be well paid for this of course.

I'm doing some of this on my own land but the slopes will only hold a few thousand gallons. Unpaid but I think it will help with soil erosion, so I'm happy.
 

farmerm

Member
Location
Shropshire
Dredging won’t help on this end of the Severn, slowing water upstream is certainly the answer. Some of the reservoirs on the Severn are held too full through the winter so overspill in storms as they have little capacity to be able hold back high flows... this only happens because we have a serious shortage of reservoir capacity, water management priority is to ensure they do not run dry in the summer rather than managing flow rates to reduce downstream floods. More total reservoir capacity would allow them to be operated with larger deficits during winter and this have more scope for buffering flows.

I think gullies are the wrong place to dam water, to hold volume they require high dams and the pressure of deep water requires massive dams. I would think it may be more cost effective to hold back water over larger areas with relatively shallow dams and flood gates.
 

ILovebaling

Member
Location
Co Durham
How much rain have we had in 12 day? And how the hell are you going to hold it back 'in the hills'? And for those of you who live in the flat land I think you need to realise the hills are saturated and the usual thing that happens to water that falls on a hill is that it then runs down it. And the steeper the hill the faster it flows. So please, educate me, how do you hold it back. Without building a resivor, which you'd never get permission to do anyway.
 

Highland Mule

Member
Livestock Farmer
Only so much you can hold it back. Can't stop it coming down but by dredging we can get rid of it quicker.

They manage to hold back water on the Conon Valley, and even generate a few megawatts of power when it’s finally released. Not rocket science to hold some back - worst case you run out of space and it’s as bad as it would have been without it, but not often that happens and even then the land below is much drier than it would be otherwise.
 

farmerm

Member
Location
Shropshire
How much rain have we had in 12 day? And how the hell are you going to hold it back 'in the hills'? And for those of you who live in the flat land I think you need to realise the hills are saturated and the usual thing that happens to water that falls on a hill is that it then runs down it. And the steeper the hill the faster it flows. So please, educate me, how do you hold it back. Without building a resivor, which you'd never get permission to do anyway.
Those permission challenges are the thing that has to change for solutions to work!

Trees on hills hold back massive amounts of water :whistle: One idea I have is on flatter tributaries placing rows of large boulders at intervals across the river, each would significantly slow the speed of flow, each row acting like a leaky dam holding back a few feet of water. Very cheap with very little environmental impact and little impact on low flow
 

glasshouse

Member
Location
lothians
Those permission challenges are the thing that has to change for solutions to work!

Trees on hills hold back massive amounts of water :whistle: One idea I have is on flatter tributaries placing rows of large boulders at intervals across the river, each would significantly slow the speed of flow, each row acting like a leaky dam holding back a few feet of water. Very cheap with very little environmental impact and little impact on low flow
Except it floods the farmers out
 

ILovebaling

Member
Location
Co Durham
We've got 6 resivors, decent sized ones not including other some ones on the hills around here, all have been full since end of September, we've got trees, lots of them, yet still the water flows. It rained so hard in July that it moved stone from the top of the hills onto farmers fields at the bottom of the valley, stone walls and even stacked bales of silage.

I'm really not sure where we could store more water in the hills around here, without building a big dam in the valley and flooding thousands of homes.
 

Pennine Ploughing

Member
Mixed Farmer
Holding it is bollox
Get it to feck down the river
That does not always work, Carlisle flooded in 2005, this was due to a high spring tide and strong winds fetching the tide in further, water had no where to go,
So dredging cannot really help on that one,
Dredging some parts and holding water up stream in low dams would help
When I say holding water up stream, it should be on the lines of a dam with a big pipe in the bottom, so water flows naturally 99% of the time, yet in heavy rain it fills the pipe to full bore, allowing a metered amount of water through, enough to fill rivers down stream , yet not to much to flood towns and villages
 
Have a look at Anton Coaker's comments.

As he points out, the "hills" haven't changed their water retention abilities in hundred of years.

However, an inch of rain on an acre of ground is about 100 tonnes of water, so with a housing density of about ten/acre, every house built since the war means another 10 tonnes of water with nowhere to go.

They may have changed their retention capacity but it may not be the main issue. But the bigger factor that is demonstrably true is that rainfall is more intense than it used to be.

When you see the flow through places like Ironbridge etc dredging would be of no impact. The channel isn't large enough to hold the flow - the same would be true of a lot of flooding through towns and villages esp when people expect the water to be speeded up
 
Last edited:

renewablejohn

Member
Location
lancs
Couple of years ago Lancashire flooded due to United Utilities keeping its reservoirs at full capacity. There was so much outrage about this I believe UU have changed there policy so that normal capacity is now 75% allowing 25% for storm surge, With so many reservoirs in Lancashire there is no excuse for Lancashire flooding no matter how much rain comes down.

That said it looks like they have gone back to there old ways and expect flooding shortly.

 
Last edited:
That does not always work, Carlisle flooded in 2005, this was due to a high spring tide and strong winds fetching the tide in further, water had no where to go,
So dredging cannot really help on that one,
Dredging some parts and holding water up stream in low dams would help
When I say holding water up stream, it should be on the lines of a dam with a big pipe in the bottom, so water flows naturally 99% of the time, yet in heavy rain it fills the pipe to full bore, allowing a metered amount of water through, enough to fill rivers down stream , yet not to much to flood towns and villages


Bridgwater has a sea gate.

I don't know if the lay of the land is similar but if a Sea Gate can be used .. could be combined with pumps to continue water moving out of the town even with a high tide.
 

How is your SFI 24 application progressing?

  • havn't been invited to apply

    Votes: 29 34.9%
  • have been invited to apply

    Votes: 17 20.5%
  • applied but not yet accepted

    Votes: 29 34.9%
  • agreement up and running

    Votes: 8 9.6%

Webinar: Expanded Sustainable Farming Incentive offer 2024 -26th Sept

  • 2,501
  • 50
On Thursday 26th September, we’re holding a webinar for farmers to go through the guidance, actions and detail for the expanded Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) offer. This was planned for end of May, but had to be delayed due to the general election. We apologise about that.

Farming and Countryside Programme Director, Janet Hughes will be joined by policy leads working on SFI, and colleagues from the Rural Payment Agency and Catchment Sensitive Farming.

This webinar will be...
Back
Top