UK ACORN,FARM FINANCE,DES PHILLIPS,BEWARE!!!!!

[Dog catcher]

All unsatified charges are with Royal Bank of Scotland in a previous incarnation were Together Lancashire Mortgages & are all directors featuring in both companies
Lancashire Mortgages certainly had close links to U K & Co

 

[mgb]

http://citywire.co.uk/new-model-adviser/?linkSource=mainlogo-article. Did someone call them serious farce office??

 

[renewablejohn]

All unsatified charges are with Royal Bank of Scotland in a previous incarnation were Together Lancashire Mortgages & are all directors featuring in both companies
Lancashire Mortgages certainly had close links to U K & Co

Exactly the same people but they have changed there name so that they can con even more people. As it is they convinced a judge in my case that a Mortgage with Lancashire Mortgage was actually Bridging Finance yet in the same group they have another company called Bridging Finance Ltd which I presume also does mortgagees given this Judges absurd conclusion. Despite financial rules to stop this deception of false trading names the FCA have now allowed all these companies to trade under the one company of Together Finance.

 

[Dog catcher]

Yes they were fined as Cheshire Mortgages
The M P for Thirsk & Northallerton has questioned Mrs May at Prime Ministers questions if she will set up an enquiry about Bank treatment of S M E s usually evasive answers

 

[Acornworm]

Extensive correspondence with S F O Des & Co are not big enough fish for them to get of their arses
Think the maligne influence of the Tresuary
Rember Private Eye named it the Serious Farce Office

I rather think it might be the BS factor that has always stood in the way of the SFO,it is still a mystery to many of those close to it,that the Hawes trial was separated from the rest of the HBOS crims.
As we know its always the cover up that catches them and rest assured there are some very clever,very determined people who joined up the dots a long time ago.At the moment ,considerably assisted by Whitehall,these scum have persuaded the authorities by some means ,possibly nefarious,that they should be left well alone,take that away from them they are nothing.Time is not on their side.

 

[Acornworm]

Exactly the same people but they have changed there name so that they can con even more people. As it is they convinced a judge in my case that a Mortgage with Lancashire Mortgage was actually Bridging Finance yet in the same group they have another company called Bridging Finance Ltd which I presume also does mortgagees given this Judges absurd conclusion. Despite financial rules to stop this deception of false trading names the FCA have now allowed all these companies to trade under the one company of Together Finance.

Have read your case.I find it totally absurd that the Judge could claim that you were unjustly enriched.For a contract to exist requires performance from both sides.For your part your lawyers handed over a charge on your property,ie you acted in good faith,conversely Goldberg and his gang of crooks didn't,they did not sign the contract,or if they did they couldn't produce it in court,so ,what appears to happen is the Judge then makes a decision based purely on assumption.She clearly didn't like you but also described Goldberg as evasive,I presume she didn't know about the FSA fines ,but I doubt that it would have made any difference,I think in the words of Fraser,you were 'doomed'.
The ruling clearly benefits any lender who doesn't want to produce a document that might disadvantage them,not only ridiculous, but very worrying.

 

[renewablejohn]

Have read your case.I find it totally absurd that the Judge could claim that you were unjustly enriched.For a contract to exist requires performance from both sides.For your part your lawyers handed over a charge on your property,ie you acted in good faith,conversely Goldberg and his gang of crooks didn't,they did not sign the contract,or if they did they couldn't produce it in court,so ,what appears to happen is the Judge then makes a decision based purely on assumption.She clearly didn't like you but also described Goldberg as evasive,I presume she didn't know about the FSA fines ,but I doubt that it would have made any difference,I think in the words of Fraser,you were 'doomed'.
The ruling clearly benefits any lender who doesn't want to produce a document that might disadvantage them,not only ridiculous, but very worrying.

Its totally wrong. The Judge should have found that the Agreement was complete and binding on both parties but that Clause 14 was a condition precedent with the effect that the terms of the Agreement were suspended until it was signed by LMC. However the Judge could not do that as then LMC could be prosecuted for the blatant instances of fraud found in the case. Far better to make the contract ineffective and then the Judge has total power to do as she pleases using restitution even if that entails using a false Equifax report that is not in my name.
As for the FSA fines they where referred to in my witness statement but as to whether she bothered to read my statement I very much doubt as her opening gambit at the trial was an apology that she had not had time to read the case documents and she would pick it up as she went along if LMC could open and explain the case. My barrister did object to this obvious bias but was over ruled.

 

[Acornworm]

Its totally wrong. The Judge should have found that the Agreement was complete and binding on both parties but that Clause 14 was a condition precedent with the effect that the terms of the Agreement were suspended until it was signed by LMC. However the Judge could not do that as then LMC could be prosecuted for the blatant instances of fraud found in the case. Far better to make the contract ineffective and then the Judge has total power to do as she pleases using restitution even if that entails using a false Equifax report that is not in my name.
As for the FSA fines they where referred to in my witness statement but as to whether she bothered to read my statement I very much doubt as her opening gambit at the trial was an apology that she had not had time to read the case documents and she would pick it up as she went along if LMC could open and explain the case. My barrister did object to this obvious bias but was over ruled.

Didn't want to read the case documents,more like.Shameful,but a fairly accurate portrayal of the judiciary.

 

[renewablejohn]

Didn't want to read the case documents,more like.Shameful,but a fairly accurate portrayal of the judiciary.

Would not mind but my Barrister even issued a warning at the start of his skeleton argument that the issues where poles apart and could not be agreed and yet the Judge still went ahead with the inevitable bias that would entail. Would have been far better to adjourn for a couple of hours to read the skeleton arguments and witness statements to get a feel for the dispute.But to turn up to a financial hearing having never heard of a pre computed loan was beyond belief. Obviously ignorant of the fact it was that type of loan which caused the financial crash in America.

 

[mgb]

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/personal-banking/savings/lost-600000-conveyancing-scam-will-no-one-help/

Lost in wilderness we all have that feeling??
Sent from my iPhone

 

[Dog catcher]

Our friend is back on the board & website at Michelmores

 

[Vile Farm]

indeed where would we be without the trusty shield of British justice and the sword of truth

 

[Acornworm]

People have been known to fall on their sword..................here's hoping

 

[Dog catcher]

Watch this space we might have the smoking gun

 

[fighter]

Watch this space we might have the smoking gun

Trouble is Sherriff in this county is blind.

 

[Dog catcher]

We are not relying on the Sherrif but legally binding contracts broken to facitate fraud

 

[Acornworm]

We are not relying on the Sherrif but legally binding contracts broken to facitate fraud

Sounds promising

 

[mgb]

Financial ombudsman ‘sided with banks’ to meet targets
Callum Jones, James Hurley In today’s Times interesting article

 

[mgb]

http://noel.world/noel-news/russia-attacks-lloyds/ Love him or loathe him Noel is doing our campaign for justice no harm whatsoever

 

[mgb]

https://www.theguardian.com/busines...ian-money-laundering-scotland-shell-companies Perhaps we now know were comrade Philip’s gets his money ?????