Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not sure on foliar K I've tried it and I could really decide if it was worth it or not. I have found consistently that epsotop and strobe at t3 raise bushels on my ground.
Tried foliar K on the beet and couldn’t see any effect. K is a bulk nutrient needed in huge quantities. Can’t see it ever getting enough through the leaves IMO.
Did hear of trials that showed it was effective against potato blight but at borderline scorching levels ( as MOP solution).
Err, just a thought . . .
if just adding potassium or magnesium or any other product reliably, consistently & cost effectively helped grain fill, or stress through “drought”, do you think maybe it would be standard practice in arid lower rainfall wheat growing regions around the world ? ( a large proportion of the worlds cereals are grown in “arid” environments )
Rather than constantly looking for another product in a bag or drum to apply, the best way to minimise the effects of low in crop rainfall is to increase the water holding capacity & infiltration of your soil, increase the carbon & humus in the soil, retain as much groundcover as you can, reduce wheel traffic as much as possible, reduce or eliminate cultivation & soil disturbance, have a hard look at plant species & varieties, row spacings & population etc etc. The worst thing you can do in a year with limited moisture is apply too much N - all that moisture is used on vegetative growth not reproductive . . . You need to carefully match fert applications to available moisture & ( realistic ) expected yields.
In other words, the most effective “drought” strategies are ALL cultural or managerial, which effectively cost nothing, rather than buying & applying more “product” . . .
as long as their is a margin over input cost then surely it’s worth it.Err, just a thought . . .
if just adding potassium or magnesium or any other product reliably, consistently & cost effectively helped grain fill, or stress through “drought”, do you think maybe it would be standard practice in arid lower rainfall wheat growing regions around the world ? ( a large proportion of the worlds cereals are grown in “arid” environments )
Rather than constantly looking for another product in a bag or drum to apply, the best way to minimise the effects of low in crop rainfall is to increase the water holding capacity & infiltration of your soil, increase the carbon & humus in the soil, retain as much groundcover as you can, reduce wheel traffic as much as possible, reduce or eliminate cultivation & soil disturbance, have a hard look at plant species & varieties, row spacings & population etc etc. The worst thing you can do in a year with limited moisture is apply too much N - all that moisture is used on vegetative growth not reproductive . . . You need to carefully match fert applications to available moisture & ( realistic ) expected yields.
In other words, the most effective “drought” strategies are ALL cultural or managerial, which effectively cost nothing, rather than buying & applying more “product” . . .
the biggest factor in milling quality is harvest weatheras long as their is a margin over input cost then surely it’s worth it.
most of your wheat makes milling. Over here, with our higher yields we often have to force it to become milling wheat on our better soils.
doesn’t make either right or wrong